Cello P50ANSMT-4K or Samsung UE49MU6400: Head to Head Review

Finding it hard to decide which TV to go for? In the following brief head to head article two similarly priced TVs are reviewed, the Cello P50ANSMT-4K and the Samsung UE49MU6400. Is it smarter to choose the Cello P50ANSMT-4K or is it smarter to consider the Samsung UE49MU6400? Lets compare the two TVs in terms of Ergonomics, Connectivity, Picture Quality and Efficiency to make the decision easier.

Ergonomics

This segment compares the Lightness, Screen Size and Thinness of the Cello P50ANSMT-4K to that of the Samsung UE49MU6400 in order to compare their Ergonomics.

Lightness
80%

16kg
88%

Screen Size
80%

124cm
69%

Thinness
80%

334.3mm
40%

To sum it up, the When it comes to Ergonomics, Cello P50ANSMT-4K is superior compared to Samsung UE49MU6400.

Connectivity

For comparing the Connectivity of the two TVs, we compare their WiFi Support, Ethernet Support, USB Ports and Smart TV.

WiFi Support
80%

true
100%

Ethernet Support
80%

true
100%

USB Ports
80%

2?
76%

Smart TV
true
100%

true
100%

Our review shows that the Connectivity of Cello P50ANSMT-4K is slightly poorer compared to that of Samsung UE49MU6400.

Picture Quality

In the following we analyze the Display Type, Refresh Frequency, HDR Support, LED Placing, Brightness and Resolution of the two TVs in order to compare their Picture Quality.

Display Type
LCD
92%

LCD
92%

Refresh Frequency
80%

60Hz
78%

HDR Support
80%

true
100%

LED Placing
80%

Back Light
100%

Resolution
3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
100%

3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
100%

The Cello P50ANSMT-4K has a marginally inferior Picture Quality compared to Samsung UE49MU6400.

Efficiency

The following segment reviews the Efficiency Classification and Power Consumption of the Cello P50ANSMT-4K to that of the Samsung UE49MU6400 for comparing their Efficiency.

Efficiency Classification
80%

A
68%

Power Consumption
80%

125kWh/year
58%

Our conclusion is that the When we look at the Efficiency, Cello P50ANSMT-4K is slightly better compared with Samsung UE49MU6400.

Final Words

To sum up this head to head comparison, when putting head to head the Ergonomics, Connectivity, Picture Quality and Efficiency of the Cello P50ANSMT-4K and the Samsung UE49MU6400 we found that when compared to the Samsung UE49MU6400 the Cello P50ANSMT-4K has better Ergonomics, marginally lesser Connectivity, marginally poorer Picture Quality and slightly superior Efficiency

Leave a Reply

Close Menu