Finding it hard to decide which TV to go for? In the following brief head to head article two similarly priced TVs are reviewed, the Cello P50ANSMT-4K and the Samsung UE49MU6400. Is it smarter to choose the Cello P50ANSMT-4K or is it smarter to consider the Samsung UE49MU6400? Lets compare the two TVs in terms of Ergonomics, Connectivity, Picture Quality and Efficiency to make the decision easier.
This segment compares the Lightness, Screen Size and Thinness of the Cello P50ANSMT-4K to that of the Samsung UE49MU6400 in order to compare their Ergonomics.
To sum it up, the When it comes to Ergonomics, Cello P50ANSMT-4K is superior compared to Samsung UE49MU6400.
For comparing the Connectivity of the two TVs, we compare their WiFi Support, Ethernet Support, USB Ports and Smart TV.
Our review shows that the Connectivity of Cello P50ANSMT-4K is slightly poorer compared to that of Samsung UE49MU6400.
In the following we analyze the Display Type, Refresh Frequency, HDR Support, LED Placing, Brightness and Resolution of the two TVs in order to compare their Picture Quality.
The Cello P50ANSMT-4K has a marginally inferior Picture Quality compared to Samsung UE49MU6400.
The following segment reviews the Efficiency Classification and Power Consumption of the Cello P50ANSMT-4K to that of the Samsung UE49MU6400 for comparing their Efficiency.
Our conclusion is that the When we look at the Efficiency, Cello P50ANSMT-4K is slightly better compared with Samsung UE49MU6400.
To sum up this head to head comparison, when putting head to head the Ergonomics, Connectivity, Picture Quality and Efficiency of the Cello P50ANSMT-4K and the Samsung UE49MU6400 we found that when compared to the Samsung UE49MU6400 the Cello P50ANSMT-4K has better Ergonomics, marginally lesser Connectivity, marginally poorer Picture Quality and slightly superior Efficiency